Friendica Admins reshared this.
Large database
!Friendica Admins
Hi everyone,
last week, I struggled with the size of my database for opensocial.at .. It went full (80GB) .. I added additional 10GB to the volume, but it seems to constantly increase and I think in a few weeks, I will be at the same situation like the last week.
Is there a possibility to shrink the database, or to wipe old data?
I recently deleted about 1.200 spam accounts (and set the register option to approval first ... lessons learned...). Are there leftovers inside the db which I can delete?
It's not that I don't have enough space, but I'm afraid of my backup borg-backup space in the near future ^^
Hi everyone,
last week, I struggled with the size of my database for opensocial.at .. It went full (80GB) .. I added additional 10GB to the volume, but it seems to constantly increase and I think in a few weeks, I will be at the same situation like the last week.
Is there a possibility to shrink the database, or to wipe old data?
I recently deleted about 1.200 spam accounts (and set the register option to approval first ... lessons learned...). Are there leftovers inside the db which I can delete?
It's not that I don't have enough space, but I'm afraid of my backup borg-backup space in the near future ^^
d778af0b0ee3462d6cff943e0a8d8a9a5364c67f
What I did:
What I did:
- Clicked at "Friendica Developers" under "Forums" inside the left navbar
- Opened a new Topic per pencil-button
Friendica Developers reshared this.
New Github/Gitea Label
!Friendica Developers
I'd like to introduce `Refactoring` as a new label. I feel like we should distinguish between "real" enhancements and "just" refactorings. What do you say?
I'd like to introduce `Refactoring` as a new label. I feel like we should distinguish between "real" enhancements and "just" refactorings. What do you say?
@Philipp Holzer Refacturing tasks are not fixing (maybe they even break some old stuff, AKA regressions) any code nor they add any new functionality. Therefore they can be seen as neither a bug (as nothing is fixed, just heavily rewritten and/or cleaned up) nor a new feature (as nothing new is added).
Friendica Developers reshared this.
Locks with hostname
!Friendica Developers
Calling @Hypolite Petovan and @Michael Vogel for support at https://github.com/friendica/friendica/pull/10601
I do want to alter the way how locks are working to make parallel hosts/nodes possible. I think the logic itself is pretty straight forward and final.
BUT - how can I upgrade the lock table without using it during the update process itself, it's a gordon knot
I think about using a new method at
Do you think it works? At least my local nodes are working, but I'm totally unsure about it yet ..
I'd like to finish this PR for 2021.12 as another preparation for making Friendica "cluster ready" :D
Calling @Hypolite Petovan and @Michael Vogel for support at https://github.com/friendica/friendica/pull/10601
I do want to alter the way how locks are working to make parallel hosts/nodes possible. I think the logic itself is pretty straight forward and final.
BUT - how can I upgrade the lock table without using it during the update process itself, it's a gordon knot
I think about using a new method at
DBStructure: https://github.com/friendica/friendica/pull/10601/files#diff-eda5315231a6379d57916642e302e3525c3de2161e7dedb209526c7cfc8afcd6R543 and execute it before using the lock.Do you think it works? At least my local nodes are working, but I'm totally unsure about it yet ..
I'd like to finish this PR for 2021.12 as another preparation for making Friendica "cluster ready" :D
Add hostname to Locks by nupplaphil · Pull Request #10601 · friendica/friendica
Superseded #9114 This should help with #9095 We now add the hostname to each lock as well. The hostname is detected based on either uname -n or per environment variable NODE_NAME. This will have th...GitHub
This entry was edited (8 months ago)
Roland Häder likes this.
@Michael Vogel @Hypolite Petovan @Friendica Developers but wouldn't that possibly create a race condition, because a 2nd worker would start another update and wouldn't find the lock anymore so update it again?
Friendica Developers reshared this.
Questions Depository
!Friendica Developers
Calling @Hypolite Petovan for help
Why did you introduce a separate "Navigation" directory under "src"?
My guess: this is really a DDD practice using a directory for a use cases and define the different class-types under it (creating boundaries between differently purposed code). But if so, why don't you include the Modules/Notification as well?
And "Navigation/Notification" triggers for me, that the focus of this class is only the notifications at the top of the navbar, am I right?
I'm trying to follow your pattern and refactor the ProfileField / PermissionSet.
Would it be a new "src":
"src/Profile" , where PermissionSet and ProfileField are Entities/ValueObjects ? Or how would you structure these repositories/models?
Calling @Hypolite Petovan for help
Why did you introduce a separate "Navigation" directory under "src"?
My guess: this is really a DDD practice using a directory for a use cases and define the different class-types under it (creating boundaries between differently purposed code). But if so, why don't you include the Modules/Notification as well?
And "Navigation/Notification" triggers for me, that the focus of this class is only the notifications at the top of the navbar, am I right?
I'm trying to follow your pattern and refactor the ProfileField / PermissionSet.
Would it be a new "src":
"src/Profile" , where PermissionSet and ProfileField are Entities/ValueObjects ? Or how would you structure these repositories/models?
This entry was edited (8 months ago)
Roland Häder likes this.
Aaahh sounds like the "good old" Model View Controller (MVC) pattern:
- Model --> where the business logic is (=> Entity, Depository, ...)
- View --> the presentation layer (=> Renderer / smarty templates)
- Controller --> The logic to show the right business logic (glue between model & view) (=> Modules)
=> And I like it
I'll give it a try after finishing the WebDav class
- Model --> where the business logic is (=> Entity, Depository, ...)
- View --> the presentation layer (=> Renderer / smarty templates)
- Controller --> The logic to show the right business logic (glue between model & view) (=> Modules)
=> And I like it
I'll give it a try after finishing the WebDav class
Roland Häder likes this.
@Philipp Holzer So I can finally setup my @Nextcloud instance as storage back-end for files being uploaded here on my Friendica instance or how do I have understand it? That is I was looking for!
Yes you can
But Disclaimer: I was the only one who tested it yet, so please test it for your own before using it in production
But Disclaimer: I was the only one who tested it yet, so please test it for your own before using it in production
Roland Häder likes this.
A test Post from Friendica
Hi all, I'm trying to reach Twitter with my new Friendica Twitter plugin
Steffen K9 🐰 likes this.
@Hypolite Petovan I got a lot of posts mirrored to my feed as well .. Do you know any other test for twitter plugin?
Not yet, but there's the unfollow API call in a PR: https://github.com/friendica/friendica-addons/pull/1173
Friendica Admins reshared this.
Tobias
•Philipp Holzer likes this.
Friendica Admins reshared this.
Philipp Holzer
•Friendica Admins reshared this.
Michael Vogel
•Squeet.me with now around 5.000 users has da database size of around 100 GB.
2 people like this
Philipp Holzer and utzer ~Friendica~ like this.